<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Energion.Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energion.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energion.net</link>
	<description>Articles and discussion regarding religion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nature of Hope by For Advent &#8211; The Nature of Hope &#124; Energion Publications</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>For Advent &#8211; The Nature of Hope &#124; Energion Publications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=130#comment-397</guid>
		<description>[...] For the Advent season, Edward W. H. Vick, author of the newly released book From Inspiration to Understanding: Reading the Bible Seriously and Faithfully, presents The Nature of Hope. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the Advent season, Edward W. H. Vick, author of the newly released book From Inspiration to Understanding: Reading the Bible Seriously and Faithfully, presents The Nature of Hope. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nature of Hope by The Nature of Hope &#171; CHRISTIAN PARENT HUB- CHRISTIAN PARENT NEWS AGGREGATOR</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nature of Hope &#171; CHRISTIAN PARENT HUB- CHRISTIAN PARENT NEWS AGGREGATOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=130#comment-354</guid>
		<description>[...] Article FROM http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/  SPONSOR- Christian Games for kids-fun and faith based curriculum GET YOUR FREE PASS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Article FROM <a href="http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/" rel="nofollow">http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/</a>  SPONSOR- Christian Games for kids-fun and faith based curriculum GET YOUR FREE PASS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Nature of Hope by The Nature of Hope &#8211; endtimesprophecyblogs</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nature of Hope &#8211; endtimesprophecyblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=130#comment-352</guid>
		<description>[...] FROM End Times Prophecy source http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/  #family movie -THE LAMP- one family&#039;s loss shows them how to turn to Faith instead of magic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FROM End Times Prophecy source <a href="http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/" rel="nofollow">http://energion.net/2011/12/the-nature-of-hope/</a>  #family movie -THE LAMP- one family&#039;s loss shows them how to turn to Faith instead of magic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sincere but Unfortunate by Herold Weiss</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/08/sincere-but-unfortunate/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Herold Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=114#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I applaud Rev. LaRochelle&#039;s very measured and reasonable response to Mr. Patton&#039;s unfortunate and misinformed claim that a Catholic cannot be a theological scholar. Like Rev. LaRochelle, I also commend that Mr. Patton does not attack theology in order to favor spirituality, something often done these days. Certainly there is ample room for both approaches to our desire to live cognizant of our dependence on God.
This attack on Catholicism is misinformed in two very specific ways. It seems to overlook that the main currents of Western theology have been nurtured by Catholicism, and it seems to ignore the nature of the doctrine of &quot;infallibility&quot; as formulated by Vatican Council I, in 1870. The Council&#039;s declaration makes very clear which declarations of the pope are infallible. Catholic canon law defines very specifically the different degrees of authority in different pronouncements issued by the Vatican. As it happens, since 1870 no statement of the Pope has been issued with &quot;infallible&quot; authority.
Catholic theologians are among the most rigorous and creative theologians around these days. They are continually pushing the boundaries of our understanding of Christian life in the world under God further and further ahead. Theology is never &quot;done&quot;. It is always to be done in attempts to answer the new questions asked by contemporary believers. In these efforts Catholic theologians are  among the best. They have no restrictions imposed by &quot;infallible&quot; statements which, as I said, are non-existent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud Rev. LaRochelle&#8217;s very measured and reasonable response to Mr. Patton&#8217;s unfortunate and misinformed claim that a Catholic cannot be a theological scholar. Like Rev. LaRochelle, I also commend that Mr. Patton does not attack theology in order to favor spirituality, something often done these days. Certainly there is ample room for both approaches to our desire to live cognizant of our dependence on God.<br />
This attack on Catholicism is misinformed in two very specific ways. It seems to overlook that the main currents of Western theology have been nurtured by Catholicism, and it seems to ignore the nature of the doctrine of &#8220;infallibility&#8221; as formulated by Vatican Council I, in 1870. The Council&#8217;s declaration makes very clear which declarations of the pope are infallible. Catholic canon law defines very specifically the different degrees of authority in different pronouncements issued by the Vatican. As it happens, since 1870 no statement of the Pope has been issued with &#8220;infallible&#8221; authority.<br />
Catholic theologians are among the most rigorous and creative theologians around these days. They are continually pushing the boundaries of our understanding of Christian life in the world under God further and further ahead. Theology is never &#8220;done&#8221;. It is always to be done in attempts to answer the new questions asked by contemporary believers. In these efforts Catholic theologians are  among the best. They have no restrictions imposed by &#8220;infallible&#8221; statements which, as I said, are non-existent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Baptism Necessary for Salvation? by robert makar</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/04/is-baptism-necessary-for-salvation/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>robert makar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=83#comment-12</guid>
		<description>How coinsidental. I just taught this chapter of Mark at our Bible Study last week. Amen on the conclusion reached. How easy it is to read verse 16 without noticing the difference between the first clause and the second. Too often we pull one verse out of Scripture and make theology out of it when there are so many other verses that do not support our conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How coinsidental. I just taught this chapter of Mark at our Bible Study last week. Amen on the conclusion reached. How easy it is to read verse 16 without noticing the difference between the first clause and the second. Too often we pull one verse out of Scripture and make theology out of it when there are so many other verses that do not support our conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WAS THE CROSS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION? by Tom Durst</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/02/was-the-cross-a-foregone-conclusion/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Durst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=79#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I do not think that the cross was to satisfy God&#039;s justice in the &quot;pay back&quot; sense of the word as has been used in many traditional Christian circles.  I think that the &quot;Christ event&quot; which includes the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Messiah Jesus reconciles MAN TO GOD and shows the eternal unity of God and His creation which can never be broken by death or anything else.  The traditional &quot;pay back&quot; interpretations of atonement to me would make God some kind of a monster that we had to appease like the pagans had to appease their gods in ancient times.

In the end we all have to find answers to these questions that make sense to us and that will help us to be more loving people.

Tom Durst</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that the cross was to satisfy God&#8217;s justice in the &#8220;pay back&#8221; sense of the word as has been used in many traditional Christian circles.  I think that the &#8220;Christ event&#8221; which includes the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Messiah Jesus reconciles MAN TO GOD and shows the eternal unity of God and His creation which can never be broken by death or anything else.  The traditional &#8220;pay back&#8221; interpretations of atonement to me would make God some kind of a monster that we had to appease like the pagans had to appease their gods in ancient times.</p>
<p>In the end we all have to find answers to these questions that make sense to us and that will help us to be more loving people.</p>
<p>Tom Durst</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WAS THE CROSS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION? by Bob Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2011/02/was-the-cross-a-foregone-conclusion/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 23:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=79#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Herold,

Thank you for this challenging meditation on the cross, not trying to harmonize ancient and modern, but pointing out the real differences of world view that need to be addressed.  

I too find it difficult to reconcile the idea that God predetermined Jesus to die on a cross to satisfy God&#039;s justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herold,</p>
<p>Thank you for this challenging meditation on the cross, not trying to harmonize ancient and modern, but pointing out the real differences of world view that need to be addressed.  </p>
<p>I too find it difficult to reconcile the idea that God predetermined Jesus to die on a cross to satisfy God&#8217;s justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider Christianity Week Contest by Energion.net &#124; Blog &#124; Contest Entries</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2010/03/consider-christianity-week-contest/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Energion.net &#124; Blog &#124; Contest Entries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=40#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, the blogswarm failed to show, very possibly because we called for it too late and perhaps not loudly enough.  But there are entries in the contest, though many fewer than we&#8217;d like.  There is still time to submit your entry. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, the blogswarm failed to show, very possibly because we called for it too late and perhaps not loudly enough.  But there are entries in the contest, though many fewer than we&#8217;d like.  There is still time to submit your entry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider Christianity Week Contest by Contest Entries &#171; Energion Publications Announcements</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2010/03/consider-christianity-week-contest/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Contest Entries &#171; Energion Publications Announcements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=40#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, the blogswarm failed to show, very possibly because we called for it too late and perhaps not loudly enough.  But there are entries in the contest, though many fewer than we&#8217;d like.  There is still time to submit your entry. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, the blogswarm failed to show, very possibly because we called for it too late and perhaps not loudly enough.  But there are entries in the contest, though many fewer than we&#8217;d like.  There is still time to submit your entry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider Christianity Week Contest by Contest via my Company &#8211; Energion Publications &#171; Threads from Henry&#039;s Web</title>
		<link>http://energion.net/2010/03/consider-christianity-week-contest/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Contest via my Company &#8211; Energion Publications &#171; Threads from Henry&#039;s Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energion.net/?p=40#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] message, except I&#8217;m trying to give some money away. My company, Energion Publications, is sponsoring a contest, and entries are very slow. There are two $50 B&amp;N gift cards on the line, one for the best [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] message, except I&#8217;m trying to give some money away. My company, Energion Publications, is sponsoring a contest, and entries are very slow. There are two $50 B&amp;N gift cards on the line, one for the best [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

